How much technical details should I include in behavioural questions?
How Much Technical Detail Should I Include in Behavioral Questions?
When preparing for a technical interview, candidates often grapple with the balance between providing sufficient technical detail and focusing on the human elements of their experiences. This tension is especially pronounced in behavioral questions, which aim to uncover how candidates handle real-world situations.
Understanding Behavioral Questions
Behavioral questions often begin with prompts like “Tell me about a time when…” or “Describe a situation in which…” The goal is to assess candidates’ soft skills, decision-making processes, and interpersonal dynamics in a work setting. However, many candidates wonder: How much technical detail is appropriate, especially when the question doesn’t seem inherently technical?
The Case for Technical Details
Take the question, “Tell me about a time you had a conflict with a coworker.” On the surface, this appears to be a straightforward interpersonal question. However, context is key. If the conflict arose during the development of a complex system—like a recommendation engine—mentioning the specific technologies involved can provide valuable insight into the nature of the disagreement.
For instance, if you explain, “We were building a recommendation engine, and my colleague proposed using tool XYZ, but I argued for using ABC,” you’re not just stating the facts; you’re also revealing your thought process. Discussing the trade-offs between XYZ and ABC can illuminate the different technical priorities and perspectives held by you and your coworker. This depth of detail can help interviewers assess your technical acumen and collaborative skills simultaneously.
Tailoring Your Response
However, it’s crucial to tailor your response to the interviewer. If you’re speaking with someone who may not be familiar with the specific technologies or tools you’re referencing, overloading them with technical jargon could obscure the essence of your story. The key is to gauge your audience’s familiarity with the tech stack and adjust your narrative accordingly.
The Human Element
Despite the technical nuances that can enrich your answer, remember that behavioral questions primarily seek to evaluate your soft skills, such as communication, conflict resolution, and teamwork. Therefore, the core of your response should focus on how you navigated the conflict. Highlight the steps you took to understand your coworker’s perspective, how you communicated your concerns, and ultimately, how you reached a resolution.
For example, you might say, “We had differing opinions on the tool to use, which led to some tension. I took the time to understand my colleague’s viewpoint on XYZ’s scalability, and I shared my concerns about the learning curve of ABC. Through open dialogue, we were able to agree on a hybrid approach that incorporated elements from both tools, ultimately leading to a successful project outcome.”
Conclusion
In summary, the balance of technical detail in behavioral questions hinges on context, audience, and the core message you wish to convey. While illustrating the technical aspects of your experience can enrich your narrative, the primary focus should remain on the human interactions and resolutions you employed. Ultimately, this approach will not only showcase your technical competencies but also your ability to work effectively within a team—an attribute that is invaluable in any engineering role.
As you prepare for your next interview, reflect on your past experiences. Identify moments of conflict or collaboration and consider how the inclusion of technical details might enhance your storytelling while keeping the focus on your interpersonal skills.
Happy interviewing!